About EduVetta
The hours spent writing up a lecture, chasing whoever missed it and marking what comes back are hours nobody planned for. That is the part we took.
Give teachers their time back. We take the repetitive work that sits around teaching: writing up a lecture, setting a paper, marking what came in, and we let AI do the first draft of it so the teacher only has to review and approve.
Measured simply: how many hours a week does a teacher get back, and how much sooner does a student hear their result.
A capable teaching assistant should not be something only large, well funded institutions can afford. We want a tutor with thirty students on their own to work with the same tools as a college with three thousand, on the same platform, at a price that makes sense for both.
Not AI that teaches instead of the teacher. AI that clears the desk so the teacher can.
Four rules that decide what goes into the product and what stays out.
AI drafts the paper, writes the summary from what you said, and marks what can be marked. A person decides whether it is right. Nothing that carries academic weight leaves the platform without a teacher signing off on it.
A finished lecture should reach the class by itself. A submitted test should arrive already marked. If a feature creates work somewhere else in the product, it is not finished.
No training programme, no implementation project, no consultant. A teacher should be able to sign up in the morning and run a real class on it that afternoon.
Written answers need review. A spoken summary needs reading back. A lecture only reaches Telegram once you have connected it. We would rather say that plainly on the page than let you discover it in front of your students.
Any teacher losing time to work they have already done.
Record it, or teach on the digital board. The summary is drafted from what you actually said. You read it back, change anything you want, and it goes to the class with the recording attached.
Explore lecture recording and digital boardEveryone in a batch shares one Telegram channel, so the summary, the board notes and the recording are already waiting there. Nobody has to message you to ask for them.
Learn how Telegram batch sharing worksDescribe the paper you want, or point it at a topic, your own notes or a YouTube video. The questions and the answer key come back drafted, and nothing reaches a student until you have read them.
See the AI question paper generatorMultiple choice, true or false and one word answers are marked as they arrive. You read the written ones, change any mark you disagree with, and export the whole class to Excel.
View AI assignments and submissionsMore about the product itself is on the FAQs page.
EduVetta is built and operated by AscendX Innovations Pvt. Ltd. It is a product in its own right rather than a general business tool adapted for schools, which is why its vocabulary is batches, lectures and papers rather than projects and tasks.
Most existing tools fall into one of two groups. Administrative systems digitise the paperwork without reducing it: the register still has to be filled, only now on a screen. Content generators write a paper but stop there, leaving you to distribute it, collect it and mark it yourself.
EduVetta is deliberately narrow and joined up instead. It takes the tasks a teacher repeats every single week and carries each one to its end, so a lecture reaches the class on its own and a paper comes back marked and waiting to be checked rather than started.
So that one teacher can start alone. Anything that needs an administrator to switch it on, a policy decision behind it, or a whole class to sign up before it does anything, turns a tool somebody could try this afternoon into a project that has to be approved first.
The scope is therefore the work a teacher already does themselves, every week, on their own authority. Staying inside that line is what lets an account be useful within an hour of creating it.
The test is whether a teacher would repeat the work weekly and whether we can finish the task rather than assist with it. Something that only produces a draft for a person to carry the rest of the way tends to add a step rather than remove one, and does not get built.
AI drafts: the questions, the answer key, the summary of a lecture, and a proposed mark for a written answer.
A teacher decides: whether that draft is used, whether the paper goes out, what a written answer is worth, and what is finally recorded. Every mark stays editable, and automatic evaluation can be turned off entirely.
Both, and they are genuinely separate paths. A teacher can run an account alone with no administrator involved and no approval to obtain. Where an institute buys for its staff, it is set up as an organization: accounts are created inside it and one plan governs all of them.
EduVetta works in a browser for teachers in India and internationally. The pricing page shows the current prices, and checkout confirms the currency and final total for your billing country.
Write to contact@eduvetta.com, call the number in the footer, or book a demo from the contact form. If you are evaluating EduVetta for a group of teachers, say how many in the message and we will arrange a walkthrough for the team rather than a generic one.